<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Case report &#8211; eBay&#8217;s request for stay of PowerSeller production order rejected by FCA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danmichaluk.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/case-report-ebays-request-for-stay-of-powerseller-production-order-rejected-by-fca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danmichaluk.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/case-report-ebays-request-for-stay-of-powerseller-production-order-rejected-by-fca/</link>
	<description>A legal blog about the law of information - By Toronto, Ontario lawyer Dan Michaluk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 02:57:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Case Report - SCC says CRA may audit one taxpayer through another &#171; All About Information</title>
		<link>http://danmichaluk.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/case-report-ebays-request-for-stay-of-powerseller-production-order-rejected-by-fca/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>Case Report - SCC says CRA may audit one taxpayer through another &#171; All About Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danmichaluk.wordpress.com/?p=203#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>[...] to be given a meaningful role in the enforcement scheme. It seems to me that the eBay case (see here and here), where the CRA utilized section 231.2 to demand production of the account and transaction [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be given a meaningful role in the enforcement scheme. It seems to me that the eBay case (see here and here), where the CRA utilized section 231.2 to demand production of the account and transaction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
